April 18, 2003don't believe the hype...since this is the big weekend for marshmallow Peeps, chocolates of all stripes, eggs, small children, chicks, and bunnies---wanted to mention once more that Easter and bunnies DON'T mix. while it's my privately-held belief that only a complete twat would adopt or purchase a pet about which they knew nothing (or next to nothing) as regards the care and handling involved, i understand completely how overwhelming the power of Cute can be. but please, with a rabbit or chick or any other pet consideration you're thinking of undertaking, do yourself and your intended the biggest favour you can and do the research first. much emphasis is placed on the difference between fiction and reality as regards children and what they grow up believing. so why are cartoons the most common basis for most people's presumptions involving more uncommon pets (and especially rabbits and mice)? while i haven't got personal issues with Bugs Bunny, he's been a terrible example to humans of how to treat bunnies properly; the most glaring example being that carrots are actually quite bad for rabbits. in small doses (a bite here or there, once in awhile), they're fine. but feeding a rabbit a diet composed entirely (or mostly) of carrots will virtually rip their intestines to shreds. not a pleasant thought, and generally not intentional---but it happens. as with anything, education is key. sometimes i wonder why i get so particularly irate about this subject. i mean, rabbits are important, but other creatures are of course important as well. and i begin to wonder, if we can't treat other human beings decently, then who the hell am i to expect that we could treat non-human beings with any modicum of respect? maybe some part of my brain considers this to be a more easily controlled thing. not entirely sure. :P my point is, most living things shouldn't be considered as "impulse buys," and that does seem to be an especially evident mentality at this particular time of year. more articles on the subject can be found here, , here, here, here, here, and here. Comments
Great. Thanks! Posted by: felicitas at May 12, 2006 04:41 AMKate-chan: 'sokay; i feel like i do the same thing a lot of the time. i think i'm making sense but then i start to think i'm really not. XD Fiona: YES. that's also something i do a lot. people who i'm friends with look at me funny sometimes as far as that goes---if it's the first time they've heard me do it. but they get used to it quickly. again, the whole change-of-context things. also with "girls" and "boys." i call EVERYONE "girls" and "boys," regardless of age. and i agree completely about being an equal-opportunity hatah! XD and you said what i meant to in a much clearer way than i had; i was completely thinking of the way "nigger" and "queer" and "fag" and so on had been coopted by the people those terms were originally meant to hurt and turned around to be empowering and/or endearing---and at any rate, brought round to meaning something other than what they originally had. as with anything, it's also context. change the context and you've effectively changed the word. (which reminds me that a boy i use to be friends with [who was fully Chinese] used to talk about opening a restaurant and calling it "Chinkies!" [much like Velma's "Jinkies!", but quite different really], but that's beside the point. although i was highly entertained. XD) Posted by: janni at April 21, 2003 08:41 AMyou got your point across just fine =) i have trouble expressing what it is exactly that i want to say. i'm like a japanese movie.. i often have no point. ^_^ Posted by: usagi at April 20, 2003 09:46 PMderagatory, damnit. Posted by: fiona at April 20, 2003 01:21 PMhmmm, i tend to use loaded words like this and deliberately use them out of their gendered context. i'm quite happy to call men bitches, hos, and cunts, just as i'm equally happy to call women the same things. (that's because i'm an equal opportunity hatah!) in a lot of ways i feel like a woman saying "cunt" is one of the more transgressive uses of the word precisely because it's sooooo loaded. if you look at the way the words "nigger" and "queer" have been co-opted by those for whom it was originally a deragory term, i think there is a lot of precedent for people using loaded words and changing the meanings by deliberately using them. and i don't know about fuck being necessarily a gender neutral word. if a woman says "i want to fuck", it's seen as a positive expression of her sexuality, while a man saying the same thing would have entirely different connotations. although that is more of a contextual thing, methinks. interesting convo. Posted by: fiona at April 20, 2003 01:20 PMPaul: exactly. XD Kate-chan: yes, but either i failed utterly to express my point as clearly as i'd have liked in my last couple of comments, or else you missed it. my point is that language, over the course of time, changes. and to my mind, the only way to make it change is to force it to ourselves. this is also partially why i brought up the subject of the Cunt book in the first place. seriously, take a look---you might find it interesting. while i know a few people have questioned the veracity of what sources Muscio used to come up with that meaning---why CAN'T we turn the meaning into something positive, something good? words mean what we make them mean. i completely detest the idea that we should be afraid of using them. Posted by: janni at April 20, 2003 11:45 AMIsn't a Bunny just a long eared , hopping type cat? Should I go do my research better? Posted by: Paul the Postman at April 19, 2003 01:20 PMthe difference between "twat"/"cunt" and "dick" is that "dick" does the fucking and "twat"/"cunt" is what gets fucked. it's a loaded word thing, and fuck is rather loaded.. but it's also gender neutral. (hence, no problem with fuck XD) and, jannyanchan, you're not misogynistic? really? XD Posted by: usagi at April 18, 2003 10:24 PMoh, and two more things. one, i think i have at least some idea of when you're attacking and when you're not. :) two, i very much care what i say. as i said before, i usually take a lot of care in what i write. as a result (and probably because of that slight delay between thinking something and getting it down through my fingers and through the keyboard), my writing tends to be a lot more well-thought-out and coherent than my speaking. i try hard not to toss of much in the way of writing without thinking. i won't say it doesn't happen ever, but generally it doesn't. :) Posted by: janni at April 18, 2003 04:09 PMkate-chan: in the classic case of words (slang especially) that have more than one commonly-derived meaning, "twat" is one. it can also mean "idiot," or possibly "dipshit," or "fuckwit," or whatever other derogatory synonym you'd like to apply. although it doesn't have as many usages as "fuck," "fuck" is also a good example of this in that while obviously there are sexual connotations (as also with "twat"), if something is "fucked up," generally the sexual connotation is not what is implied. yet this is perfectly acceptable, in the grand pantheon of swearing. same with saying someone's dicked you over. why not twat? words are powerful, but they should not be feared. perhaps because "fuck" is so much more popular, it's lost some of its power to offend. perhaps if "twat" were more popular, it would cease to be such an offensive term as well. i'd also hope you know me well enough by now to know that i'm very much not misogynistic, and take what i've written in the manner in which it was intended. additionally, there's also issues of reclamations of formerly derogatory words (which i wasn't doing here, as i did in fact mean it in a derogatory manner---just a slightly different one), but i think that's a very interesting topic to take up as well. take something negative and degrading and demeaning and turn it into a phrase of empowerment. (c.f. Inga Muscio's Cunt: a Declaration of Independence) as for neutrality, i actually rather like loaded words. i like playing with them. i like exploring why they're forbidden, the etymologies, the possible multiple meanings, etc., etc. i like words in general, and i do try to use them carefully. and i generally don't tend to use them without knowing what they mean first---i did do that when i was probably in my early teens, but learned rather quickly that that's one of the fastest ways to look like an idiot. :) Posted by: janni at April 18, 2003 04:05 PMi agree with your opinions totally. small comment: instead of saying "twat" for something like "asshole," say something more neutral. we're learning in Women's Studies how words like sissy and cunt and pussy are all female-diminuative.. i don't know. i sound stupid writing this, and it's not an attack, it's just... um.. i hope when i write things that could be construed to be anti-female or that are female-degrading someone points them out to me so that i don't use it again. you probably don't care and i should leave you alone. X_X;;; (don't be offended, i love you jannyanchan!!!) Posted by: usagi at April 18, 2003 03:25 PMPost a comment
|
Archives
March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 janni likes to cook and bake. a lot. but mostly? she likes to sharpen her knives. because a dull knife is a dangerous knife, and we simply can't have that... about this layout: this is acid reflux v. 5.0 of Headphones Save Lives. featuring the ebullient
archives by category
2xWheels = 2xFun MiniMINIMiniMINI! announcements! auto, motor und sport band stuff being boring clippings faffing off fangirling geeking jannicam keekipr0n! XD music of the random ranting recipes
i made this!
kerfuffle.org
Licking the Spoon swek.com
Allez Cuisine!
Tyrone Shoelaces
2strokebuzz The Tofu Hut This is Grand Teaching the Indie Kids to Dance Again Sumy Shannon Sarah Dyer Said the Gramophone Rikki Simons Riki Resonance The Null Device No Rock n' Roll Fun Nonstop Pop Neil Gaiman Music (for Robots) Meril Largehearted Boy Joe's Garage Fluxblog Fionachu Evan Dorkin Elizabeth Watasin CTA Tattler Chipple Boomselection
rings around the world:
yum yum! shoujo-ai |